Acommodations Nearby

For the ceremony and reception we would ask that you dress formal or semi formal.

For the men, a suit or a long sleeved collared shirt and tie is recommended. 

For the women we would ask that you wear a modest dress which covers the arms and knees and a head covering for the ceremony and mass (hat or veil). 

The invitations will mention specific names of the people invited or will simply say for example, "The John Smith Family", which implies that the whole family including the children are invited to the wedding.  

Please RSVP by Sunday June 9th of 2024 

We will not be having dancing at the wedding, but the bride and groom will have their first dance. 

We are so are grateful for your prayers and mass offerings and are more than satisfied with that. If, however you would like to give a gift you can access our registry here. 

According to the fact that there is a crisis in the Church at present, the priests are given supplied jurisdiction which allow the traditional priests to hear confessions and witness Catholic Marriages. 

There should no doubt for the validity of these confessions or marriages. 

Canon Law allows for these “emergency marriages” - See Canon 968, 1026, 967 S2, 1116 S1

The SSPX priests have Extraordinary Jurisdiction without passing by the constituted authorities for the sake of the faithful's needs- as seen in Canon Law

Extraordinary Form for Marriages ( Canon 1116, Paragraph 1) says they can marry before a priest (of the sspx ) in times of necessity. 

Traditional priests do have a jurisdiction that is neither territorial nor personal but supplied by in view of the needs of the faithful.

 No they are not. 

 Schism, defined in Canon 751, means refusal of subjection to the Supreme Pontiff or refusal of communion with other members of the Church. A mere act of disobedience to a superior does not imply denial that the superior holds office or has authority. The child who says, “I won't!” to his mother does not deny that she is his mother; the soldier ordered to polish his buttons by his officer, who instead smokes a cigarette, is not denying the validity of the Queen's Commission. Again, for the charge of ‘Schism’ to stick, it must be certain beyond all reasonable doubt. 

 The point may seem academic: to support a schismatic against the Pope and ‘adhere’ to him is to join in his schism; but we have shown that the charge of schism will not stick. Even if it did, it would not automatically involve the laity who attend Mass Centres in excommunication. Canon 844.2 allows the faithful to seek the Sacraments of Communion, Penance and Extreme Page 6 Traditionalist “Schism”/”Excommunication”..? 

 It is for the Pope and bishops to justify their actions. They have abandoned the traditional rites of Mass and the Sacraments, they have allowed heresy to be taught, and abuse to abound throughout the Church. Traditional Catholics have merely remained faithful to what the Church has always taught and done, and this fidelity to tradition is the sole cause of all their problems with authority. 

Read more here

For Anthony and Jane, the decision to marry within the Resistance was deeply influenced by their concerns over what they perceived as compromises made by the Conciliar SSPX, particularly under the leadership of Bishop Fellay. The signing of the doctrinal declaration with Rome in 2012 was a pivotal moment that underscored their apprehensions about the direction of the SSPX.

The doctrinal declaration, in Anthony and Jane's view, represented a departure from the principled stance of Archbishop Lefebvre and the foundational mission of the SSPX. They saw it as a compromise with modernist tendencies within the Church, particularly regarding the acceptance of Vatican II and the New Mass as legitimately promulgated.

This compromise with Rome troubled Anthony and Jane deeply, as it seemed to contradict the SSPX's original mission to preserve traditional Catholic teachings in the face of perceived errors within the Church. They felt that by acquiescing to Rome's demands, the SSPX leadership had compromised its fidelity to traditional doctrine and risked diluting the integrity of the faith.

The signing of the doctrinal declaration served as a catalyst for Anthony and Jane to reevaluate their allegiance and seek out a community that remained steadfast in its commitment to traditional Catholic teachings. They found solace and affirmation within the Resistance movement, where priests and faithful alike refused to compromise on matters of doctrine and tradition.

In choosing to marry within the Resistance, Anthony and Jane sought to align themselves with a community that shared their unwavering commitment to preserving the timeless truths of the Catholic faith. Their decision was driven by a desire to uphold the legacy of Archbishop Lefebvre and to ensure that their sacramental union reflected a fidelity to traditional Catholic teachings unmarred by compromise.

It was not solely due to the specific date that we chose to marry outside of the Conciliar SSPX. While the difficulties we experienced in the SSPX certainly played a role, for Anthony, it was a gradual realization that had been unfolding over time. However, the challenges we faced regarding our desired wedding date served as a catalyst for deeper introspection. For Jane, it was an eye-opening experience that prompted her to seek answers to why things were so arduous within the SSPX community.

Throughout our engagement, we carefully considered the practical aspects of planning a wedding while prioritizing the spiritual dimension of our union. Our commitment to each other and to our faith guided every decision we made, ensuring that our wedding would be a testament to our shared values and beliefs.

Our decision to marry on July 26 was not only a testament to our devotion to St. Anne but also a reaffirmation of our commitment to traditional Catholic values. This date held deep significance for us, symbolizing our unwavering trust in St. Anne's guidance and our faith in the Resistance movement. Ultimately, our wedding on July 26 signifies our steadfast dedication to preserving the integrity of our faith and upholding the traditions passed down to us.

While some may perceive our decision as imprudent, we approach it with confidence and trust in God's providence. Our faith remains steadfast, unshaken by doubts or uncertainties. We believe that our union is blessed by God and that our wedding day will be a celebration of His love and grace.

In the face of skepticism, we stand firm in our convictions, knowing that our decision is rooted in faith and guided by love. We believe that our marriage is a sacred bond, strengthened by our unwavering commitment to each other and to our faith.